Insurers Urged to Ensure Fairness Before Stopping Payouts

0

The focal point of the dispute centered on TAL's decision to stop payments without prior notification. The AFCA found this action unjust, supporting the claimant's assertion that payments should have continued until she resumed work in August. In response, AFCA ordered TAL to compensate the claimant, covering benefits up to July 28, adjusting the payout based on profit and loss statements, and providing interest for unpaid and underpaid amounts.

TAL initially rejected these claims, citing policy conditions that required adherence to medical treatment recommended by the claimant's doctors, which the claimant had allegedly not followed. Although the policy specified the need for ongoing medical care and compliance with recommendations, the claimant had opted for a conservative treatment approach, diverging from suggested cortisone injections and a surgical opinion.

In its findings, AFCA acknowledged that the absence of the claimant from work from February last year was not unequivocally justified but emphasised that the insurer should have communicated concerns promptly. This lack of timely communication potentially hindered the insurer’s ability to cut off payments earlier under appropriate procedural notice.

This ruling serves as a critical reminder to insurers about the necessity of procedural diligence when making decisions that impact policyholders' financial well-being. It underscores the duty of fair and timely notice, essential for maintaining trust and transparency in insurance dealings. For consumers, it highlights the importance of understanding policy requirements and maintaining open communication with insurers.

The AFCA’s decision is poised to influence how insurers manage benefit reassessment and termination processes. The case highlights the need for insurers to tighten their procedural practices to prevent similar disputes. Moving forward, insurers may implement more robust communication protocols and procedural fairness checks to ensure compliance with AFCA’s guidelines. This could also lead to broader industry reviews on income protection policies and claims management, fostering greater accountability.

Published:Tuesday, 22nd Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

NSW Workers’ Compensation Scheme Faces Major Overhaul Amid Underinsurance Issues 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) has identified critical issues of underinsurance and employer non-compliance within the icare workers’ compensation scheme. A recent review highlighted that over $60 million in premiums were not collected due to missing wage declarations, with about 75% of employers audited showing non-compliance responsible for an additional $24.5 million in unpaid premiums. - read more

Insurer Prevails in Vehicle Value Dispute 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a protest from a car owner against her insurer, RAC Insurance, regarding the reduction of her vehicle's agreed value has been dismissed. The case arose after the complainant made a total loss claim following an accident in October, only to discover that her vehicle's value had been adjusted down to $29,700 from a previous total of $40,000. - read more

Microsoft Under Fire After Major SharePoint Security Breach 22 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Microsoft is grappling with an alarming security breach affecting its SharePoint collaboration software, impacting organisations and government entities globally. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recently unveiled the vulnerability, warning that it permits unauthorised access to systems and complete access to SharePoint content, enabling malicious actors to execute code across networks. - read more

Insurers Urged to Ensure Fairness Before Stopping Payouts 22 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has highlighted the importance of procedural fairness in a ruling against TAL, a major life insurer. The directive stresses that insurers must allow customers an opportunity to respond before ceasing their benefits. This ruling came after TAL halted payments under an income protection policy from May 2023 to February 2024, issuing a procedural fairness letter only in June last year, months after payments ceased. - read more

Tasmanian Liberals Propose State-Backed Insurance Amid Criticism 21 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Tasmanian Liberal Party, under Premier Jeremy Rockliff, is advocating for a state-backed general insurer—TasInsure—should they win the upcoming state election on July 19. This initiative aims to mitigate rising insurance premiums allegedly caused by the national market's failures. However, the plan has been met with strong opposition from private insurers and critics who question its viability. - read more

AFCA Sides with Policyholder in Storm Damage Dispute 18 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has favoured a policyholder in a dispute with insurer Auto & General over storm damage. The case involved a collapsed ceiling, initially attributed to a storm by the insurer before an about-face led them to deny the claim. The AFCA decision marks a significant instance where consumer protection mechanisms have countered an insurer's attempt to deny coverage. - read more