Life Insurance Code changes: why businesses should not wait
Clearer rules may help, but policy structure still matters
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Australia’s life insurance sector is again focused on conduct standards, with industry attention shifting from review recommendations to the practical work of updating the Life Insurance Code of Practice.
For households, the discussion is about clearer communication, fairer claims handling and better support when people are vulnerable.
For business owners, the same themes matter in a more commercial way: a key person insurance policy is only valuable if the cover is well structured, understood and capable of responding when disruption strikes.
This development builds on our earlier discussion of the Life Insurance Code review, which highlighted how proposed changes could affect product design, disclosure, claims processes and customer support. The latest industry conversation suggests insurers will face continuing pressure to simplify explanations, reduce friction in administration and show stronger evidence that customers understand what they are buying.
That is positive, but it should not create false comfort. A clearer Code can improve minimum standards, yet it cannot fix a policy that has the wrong owner, an outdated sum insured, an unsuitable benefit type or exclusions that do not match the business risk. Key person cover often sits across revenue protection, debt repayment, shareholder agreements, succession planning and tax treatment. Each of those areas needs deliberate planning, not a once-and-forget approach.
For SMEs, the practical question is whether current cover still reflects the real value of the people the business depends on. A founder who was once mainly operational may now hold lender relationships, investor confidence and strategic knowledge. A senior salesperson may account for a large portion of recurring revenue. A technical specialist may be difficult to replace quickly in a tight labour market. These are not just HR risks; they are balance sheet and cash flow risks.
Business owners should use the Code reform period as a prompt to review three areas:
whether each insured person is still genuinely critical to revenue, operations or business continuity;
whether the benefit amount reflects current debt, replacement costs, lost profit and transition time;
whether policy ownership, beneficiary arrangements and purpose are documented clearly enough for tax, accounting and claims purposes.
It may also be worth taking time to estimate the size of the exposure before comparing cover options or speaking with an adviser. The number does not need to be perfect at the first pass, but it should be grounded in turnover, margins, liabilities and realistic disruption periods.
The message for Australian businesses is straightforward: better industry rules may make life insurance easier to navigate, but they do not replace active risk management. If a key person would be hard to replace tomorrow, the policy protecting that risk deserves attention today.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The latest phase of New South Wales strata reform has brought strata insurance disclosure back into practical focus, moving the issue from policy debate to renewal-season reality for owners corporations. The changes are designed to make it clearer when a strata managing agent, broker, insurer or related party receives a commission, fee or other financial benefit connected with arranging insurance. - read more
Fresh life insurance performance data from APRA points to a market that is steadier than the disrupted conditions seen in recent years, but not one where employers can afford to be passive. For CFOs, HR leaders and directors, the message is less about a single quarterly result and more about the operating environment behind corporate life insurance pricing, claims service and product design. - read more
A fresh push to reform how NSW funds emergency services has put insurance affordability back in the spotlight, especially for small businesses that already feel every increase at renewal time. The issue centres on the Emergency Services Levy, which is applied through many insurance policies and has long been criticised by parts of the insurance sector as a disincentive to maintaining adequate cover. - read more
Australia’s tougher operational risk regime is sharpening the focus on how life insurers manage the systems, partners and processes that sit behind every policy. APRA’s CPS 230 standard requires regulated insurers to identify critical operations, set clear disruption tolerances and strengthen oversight of material service providers. For customers, this is not just a back-office compliance story. - read more
Fresh compliance attention on life insurance claims handling is a timely reminder that cover is only valuable if it can respond clearly and efficiently when a business is under pressure. Recent industry monitoring has again highlighted familiar issues for life insurers, including claim delays, communication gaps, repeated evidence requests and the need for more consistent support where customers are vulnerable or dealing with complex medical events. - read more
Australia’s life insurance sector is entering a more demanding phase of operational risk oversight, with APRA’s CPS 230 standard now shaping how insurers manage service disruption, outsourcing, technology failures and critical business processes. While this may sound like a back-office regulatory issue, it has practical consequences for businesses that rely on key person cover to protect cash flow, debt commitments and continuity planning. - read more
Those who work the land know that every farm has its own heartbeat - its unique rhythm defined by the crops it yields, the livestock it nurtures, and the natural environment it exists within. Recognizing this individuality is crucial, especially when it comes to safeguarding your agricultural investment with the right insurance policy. - read more
Farm liability insurance can help New Zealand farmers manage claims from people outside the business, such as visitors, neighbours, customers, contractors or road users. This guide explains common liability risks and how this cover fits alongside broader farm insurance. - read more
New Zealand's farming community forms the backbone of its thriving agricultural sector, yet many overlook the critical importance of proactive estate planning. With farmland often being held within families for generations, securing its future is not just a financial concern, but a deeply personal one as well. - read more
Livestock and crops are among the most important assets on many New Zealand farms. This guide explains how livestock and crop insurance can fit into a broader farm insurance policy, what risks may be considered, and what records farmers may need when reviewing cover. - read more
Farm insurance premiums in New Zealand can vary widely because each farm has different assets, activities, exposures and cover choices. This guide explains the main factors that may influence the cost of a rural insurance quote. - read more
Farming is a vital part of New Zealand's economy and cultural heritage, representing a way of life for thousands across the country. With its unique landscapes and diverse climate, New Zealand farmers are renowned for producing a wide array of high-quality products that serve not only the nation's needs but also supply a multitude of international markets. - read more
Need a Quote?
Start your free farm insurance quote comparison here.
Knowledgebase
Subrogation: An insurance carrier may reserve the "right of subrogation" in the event of a loss. This means that the company may choose to take action to recover the amount of a claim paid to a covered insured if the loss was caused by a third party.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.