The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent adjudication, a property owner faced a coverage denial due to damage attributed to rodents, offering a revealing insight into insurance claim disputes.
When a strata property holder reported water damage from a damaged dishwasher hose, her insurance claim was thwarted by the involvement of rodents.
The issue arose when the claimant noticed a malfunction in her dishwasher as early as April of the previous year and filed a claim in September. However, Strata Community Insurance Agencies challenged the claim arguing that the damage might engage exclusions pertaining to rodent activity.
Central to this case was a tax invoice detailing observations from a visiting plumber. According to the original report, the plumber suspected damage caused by rodents chewing on the hose. Yet, the said invoice was later altered to omit this suspicion, raising further questions about motive and clarity.
Further dialogue between the plumber and the insurer's representative disclosed that changes to the invoice were requested by the policyholder. Additionally, alternative explanations surfaced, such as potential damage from consistent interaction of the hose with the access hole each time the machine was used. The plumber did not exclude the possibility of continuous friction contributing to the damage.
The insurance provider's expert, however, observed extensive damage on the hose but reported an absence of signs that typical wear and tear would leave. The expert concluded that the use of the dishwasher was unlikely to generate sufficient force to result in such severe damage. They further stated that the condition of the hose strongly indicated rodent activity as initially suggested by the plumber.
During the dispute resolution hearing, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority evaluated the matter. They acknowledged the customer's view disputing the expert judgment but emphasized her failure to present any compelling evidence to counter the presented arguments.
The authority, after reviewing the diverse perspectives and the expert observations, ruled in favor of accepting the view that rodents were probably the primary cause of the damage. While this event originally triggered policy coverage, the clauses excluding rodent damage ultimately prevailed to deny the claim.
Echoing this outcome, an ombudsman for the AFCA commented, “I am satisfied, without evidence to contrary, it is fair that the insurer be permitted to rely on the opinions provided by the appointed consultants.†This position emphasizes the criticality of providing concrete evidence when challenging an insurer's expert analysis.
This case serves as a compelling reminder for policyholders of the complexities and critical nuances involved in insurance claims, especially those involving ambiguous causes like rodent activity. It underscores the importance of detailed documentation and professional assessments when navigating through such disputes.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Safe Work Australia’s latest Key Work Health and Safety Statistics, released on 12 October 2026, provide a fresh reminder that construction remains one of the country’s highest-risk work environments. The national data records 41 construction worker fatalities in 2025 and shows construction accounted for 11.7% of serious workers’ compensation claims in 2024-25, making the figures directly relevant to trade businesses reviewing safety systems, contracts and insurance arrangements. - read more
A damaging hailstorm across Victoria’s Mallee has turned a promising harvest into a difficult insurance and cash-flow test for affected grain growers. ABC Rural reported on 6 November 2026 that hail swept through districts including Birchip, Wycheproof and Quambatook, damaging thousands of hectares of wheat, barley, lentils, canola and other crops just as many paddocks were ready to harvest. - read more
A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision has highlighted a difficult but common issue for strata communities: damage that happens during a storm is not always insured storm damage. The dispute, reported on 5 November 2026, involved an owners corporation claim for a collapsed parapet wall, with the insurer declining cover on the basis that defective design, materials or workmanship were the dominant cause rather than the weather event itself. - read more
A new Australian healthcare professional liability market update points to a sharper divide between general insurance market conditions and the experience of healthcare organisations arranging malpractice and professional liability cover. Lockton’s 1 November 2026 update says established insurers remain selective, claims inflation is affecting attachment points and underwriters are looking more closely at how clinical governance works in practice, not merely whether accreditation exists. - read more
Western Australia’s updated Working With Children Check laws are a timely reminder that fitness business risk is not limited to physical injury, equipment damage or venue incidents. The changes, in effect from 17 September 2026 and highlighted by AUSactive in October, mean certain adverse Working With Children outcomes from other Australian jurisdictions can now affect a person’s ability to work with children in WA. - read more
APRA’s latest comments on artificial intelligence in insurance have shifted attention from future technology to a practical issue for today’s small operators: the quality of the information insurers use to understand risk. For domestic and home service businesses, sharper underwriting could eventually mean more tailored pricing, but it may also make incomplete records, unclear operations or higher-risk work harder to overlook. - read more
Farming is a vital part of New Zealand's economy and cultural heritage, representing a way of life for thousands across the country. With its unique landscapes and diverse climate, New Zealand farmers are renowned for producing a wide array of high-quality products that serve not only the nation's needs but also supply a multitude of international markets. - read more
Farm liability insurance can help New Zealand farmers manage claims from people outside the business, such as visitors, neighbours, customers, contractors or road users. This guide explains common liability risks and how this cover fits alongside broader farm insurance. - read more
Those who work the land know that every farm has its own heartbeat - its unique rhythm defined by the crops it yields, the livestock it nurtures, and the natural environment it exists within. Recognizing this individuality is crucial, especially when it comes to safeguarding your agricultural investment with the right insurance policy. - read more
New Zealand's farming community forms the backbone of its thriving agricultural sector, yet many overlook the critical importance of proactive estate planning. With farmland often being held within families for generations, securing its future is not just a financial concern, but a deeply personal one as well. - read more
Farm insurance in New Zealand can combine cover for buildings, machinery, vehicles, livestock, crops, liability, income disruption and other rural risks, depending on the policy and farm operation. - read more
Farm insurance premiums in New Zealand can vary widely because each farm has different assets, activities, exposures and cover choices. This guide explains the main factors that may influence the cost of a rural insurance quote. - read more
Need a Quote?
Start your free farm insurance quote comparison here.
Knowledgebase
Insurable Interest: A financial or other kind of interest in the insured item or person, necessary for a valid insurance contract.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.