The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent adjudication, a property owner faced a coverage denial due to damage attributed to rodents, offering a revealing insight into insurance claim disputes.
When a strata property holder reported water damage from a damaged dishwasher hose, her insurance claim was thwarted by the involvement of rodents.
The issue arose when the claimant noticed a malfunction in her dishwasher as early as April of the previous year and filed a claim in September. However, Strata Community Insurance Agencies challenged the claim arguing that the damage might engage exclusions pertaining to rodent activity.
Central to this case was a tax invoice detailing observations from a visiting plumber. According to the original report, the plumber suspected damage caused by rodents chewing on the hose. Yet, the said invoice was later altered to omit this suspicion, raising further questions about motive and clarity.
Further dialogue between the plumber and the insurer's representative disclosed that changes to the invoice were requested by the policyholder. Additionally, alternative explanations surfaced, such as potential damage from consistent interaction of the hose with the access hole each time the machine was used. The plumber did not exclude the possibility of continuous friction contributing to the damage.
The insurance provider's expert, however, observed extensive damage on the hose but reported an absence of signs that typical wear and tear would leave. The expert concluded that the use of the dishwasher was unlikely to generate sufficient force to result in such severe damage. They further stated that the condition of the hose strongly indicated rodent activity as initially suggested by the plumber.
During the dispute resolution hearing, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority evaluated the matter. They acknowledged the customer's view disputing the expert judgment but emphasized her failure to present any compelling evidence to counter the presented arguments.
The authority, after reviewing the diverse perspectives and the expert observations, ruled in favor of accepting the view that rodents were probably the primary cause of the damage. While this event originally triggered policy coverage, the clauses excluding rodent damage ultimately prevailed to deny the claim.
Echoing this outcome, an ombudsman for the AFCA commented, “I am satisfied, without evidence to contrary, it is fair that the insurer be permitted to rely on the opinions provided by the appointed consultants.†This position emphasizes the criticality of providing concrete evidence when challenging an insurer's expert analysis.
This case serves as a compelling reminder for policyholders of the complexities and critical nuances involved in insurance claims, especially those involving ambiguous causes like rodent activity. It underscores the importance of detailed documentation and professional assessments when navigating through such disputes.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A fresh National Heavy Vehicle Regulator action against a heavy vehicle operator is a timely reminder that insurance risk is not limited to what happens at the moment of a crash. The NHVR announced on 30 October 2026 that it had issued a prohibition notice after identifying significant and ongoing safety risks, including repeated defects in safety-critical systems and concerns about the operator’s management controls. - read more
A recent income protection dispute has put fresh attention on a difficult but important issue for Australian workers: a medical condition may be treated as pre-existing even where a formal diagnosis comes later. The case, reported on 9 November 2026, involved a prostate cancer claim that was declined after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority accepted that earlier medical warning signs and specialist investigations were enough to trigger a pre-existing condition exclusion. - read more
The Fair Work Commission’s varied fuel cost recovery order will restart obligations from 23 November 2026, requiring covered road transport contractual chains to account for higher fuel costs against the 6 March 2026 benchmark. For truck operators, the immediate issue is contract pricing, but the insurance angle is also important: cash flow, route choices, subcontracting arrangements and vehicle utilisation all influence how risk is presented and managed. - read more
A Queensland Court of Appeal decision involving AIA Australia has put renewed attention on how technical policy conditions can affect total and permanent disability claims, and why business owners should not treat insurance wording as a background detail. The case concerned group TPD cover held through superannuation, but its broader message is relevant to SMEs that rely on life, TPD and disability-style cover to protect debt, ownership arrangements and business continuity. - read more
APRA’s latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics, released on 16 October 2026 and covering the 12 months to 30 June 2026, provide a useful reminder for Australian businesses: the practical value of cover often depends on how clearly it is structured, documented and understood before a claim ever arises. - read more
ASIC’s latest life insurance priorities are a timely reminder that the value of cover depends not only on the policy wording, but on the systems and conduct behind it. In a 30 September 2026 letter to life insurer boards and executives, the regulator identified customer service basics, funeral insurance practices and ongoing conduct risks as key areas of focus for the 2026-27 financial year. - read more
Farm insurance premiums in New Zealand can vary widely because each farm has different assets, activities, exposures and cover choices. This guide explains the main factors that may influence the cost of a rural insurance quote. - read more
Farm liability insurance can help New Zealand farmers manage claims from people outside the business, such as visitors, neighbours, customers, contractors or road users. This guide explains common liability risks and how this cover fits alongside broader farm insurance. - read more
Farm insurance in New Zealand can combine cover for buildings, machinery, vehicles, livestock, crops, liability, income disruption and other rural risks, depending on the policy and farm operation. - read more
In the heart of New Zealand's pastoral verdure, the significance of preparedness for natural disasters is paramount for the farming industry. The distinct landscape, while providing an idyllic backdrop for agricultural pursuits, is not without its challenges. Farmers are often at the mercy of nature's unpredictability, making disaster preparedness not just prudent but essential for the continuity of their livelihood. - read more
New Zealand's farming community forms the backbone of its thriving agricultural sector, yet many overlook the critical importance of proactive estate planning. With farmland often being held within families for generations, securing its future is not just a financial concern, but a deeply personal one as well. - read more
Those who work the land know that every farm has its own heartbeat - its unique rhythm defined by the crops it yields, the livestock it nurtures, and the natural environment it exists within. Recognizing this individuality is crucial, especially when it comes to safeguarding your agricultural investment with the right insurance policy. - read more
Need a Quote?
Start your free farm insurance quote comparison here.
Knowledgebase
Whole Life Insurance: A type of life insurance that provides coverage for the insured's entire lifetime, with a savings component that builds cash value.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.