The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a significant development, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court against QBE Insurance Group.
The move comes over what ASIC describes as serious issues with pricing discounts offered by the insurer that may have impacted over half a million policyholders.
According to ASIC, certain pricing mechanisms implemented by QBE inadvertently nullified the promised discounts under specific conditions, potentially reducing them to non-existence.
As ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court emphatically stated that the failure by insurers to deliver on pricing promises is a key priority for ASIC and that they will continue to take action to hold insurers to account. She further emphasized the need for robust systems and controls to ensure customers receive their entitled discounts.
The contentious discounts were marketed primarily through renewal communications to various customer segments, including retirees, loyal clients, shareholders, policyholders with multiple QBE products, and those without claims. Furthermore, these discount offers were featured in QBE's product disclosure statements available online.
ASIC elaborates that the post-discount pricing system at QBE allowed mechanisms like a minimum premium system, alongside cupping and capping procedures, which could significantly alter the actual discount value available to customers.
In response, QBE acknowledged the legal process concerns its delivery of pricing promises on policies such as caravan, household, marine, and motor insurance. These issues, QBE points out, stem from practices between July 2017 and September 2022.
QBE has since undertaken measures to rectify past inconsistencies, submitting a report to ASIC and emphasizing its continued cooperation. They stated in a release, “QBE apologises for the inconsistencies. QBE understands the importance of meeting its promises to its customers. QBE will review the pleadings and continue to work with ASIC on these matters.”
For severity, QBE had reserved $US75 million ($112 million) in July 2022 as part of a remediation initiative aimed at addressing these issues.
The ongoing focus of ASIC on pricing discounts dates back to October 2021, when it instructed several insurers to scrutinize and rectify their discount practices. ASIC further requested 11 companies to “fix, repay and report” any issues associated with such discounts.
According to a regulator report released in June of the previous year, significant corrective measures had led general insurers to repay a cumulative $815 million to in excess of 5.6 million customers due to discrepancies in pricing observed since January 2018.
Such legal entanglements aren’t new for the industry. In recent history, IAG faced action resulting in a $40 million penalty for loyalty discounts related to home insurance under the NRMA brand.
The insurance news source Insurance News Magazine has covered similar outcomes, highlighting challenges faced by major insurers such as RACQ, which incurred a $10 million fine for similar allegations.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
APRA’s latest life insurance performance data has put income protection back under the spotlight, with disability income products continuing to be one of the more closely watched areas of the sector. While the broader life insurance industry has been showing signs of improved stability, the update reinforces that policies designed to replace income after illness or injury remain sensitive to claims experience, pricing, and changing work and health trends. - read more
Australia’s latest severe weather preparedness messaging from the insurance sector is a timely reminder that boat owners face a different risk profile to many households. Storms, flood surge, hail, cyclonic winds and marina damage can all affect vessels well before a skipper has a chance to move them. For owners in Queensland, New South Wales, Western Australia and the Northern Territory in particular, the lead-up to summer is not just a maintenance checkpoint; it is a financial protection checkpoint. - read more
Recent industry reporting on the latest insurance complaints environment points to a clear message for Australian small businesses: the hardest part of insurance is often not buying a policy, but relying on it when something goes wrong. Disputes continue to arise around claim delays, declined claims, settlement amounts, policy exclusions and communication breakdowns between customers and insurers. - read more
Australia’s latest financial dispute data has put insurance claims handling back in the spotlight, with consumers and small businesses continuing to seek outside help when problems with insurers cannot be resolved directly. The trend is a timely reminder that an insurance policy should be assessed not only on premium, but also on how clearly it explains cover, how exclusions work, and how effectively claims are managed when pressure is highest. - read more
Australian beauty businesses offering higher-risk aesthetic treatments are facing another reminder that compliance is now a front-of-house issue, not just a back-room admin task. Recent beauty industry reporting has focused on the continued scrutiny of cosmetic injectables, skin procedures and treatment advertising, with regulators expecting clearer consent, accurate marketing and suitable clinical oversight where health-related services are provided. - read more
The Federal Government’s move to legislate a ban on the adverse use of genetic test results in life insurance underwriting is a significant development for Australians who have avoided health screening because of concerns about future insurability. For employers, directors and business owners, it also raises an important planning question: how should workplace and business-owned cover evolve when underwriting rules change? - read more
Farming is a vital part of New Zealand's economy and cultural heritage, representing a way of life for thousands across the country. With its unique landscapes and diverse climate, New Zealand farmers are renowned for producing a wide array of high-quality products that serve not only the nation's needs but also supply a multitude of international markets. - read more
New Zealand's farming community forms the backbone of its thriving agricultural sector, yet many overlook the critical importance of proactive estate planning. With farmland often being held within families for generations, securing its future is not just a financial concern, but a deeply personal one as well. - read more
In the heart of New Zealand's pastoral verdure, the significance of preparedness for natural disasters is paramount for the farming industry. The distinct landscape, while providing an idyllic backdrop for agricultural pursuits, is not without its challenges. Farmers are often at the mercy of nature's unpredictability, making disaster preparedness not just prudent but essential for the continuity of their livelihood. - read more
Those who work the land know that every farm has its own heartbeat - its unique rhythm defined by the crops it yields, the livestock it nurtures, and the natural environment it exists within. Recognizing this individuality is crucial, especially when it comes to safeguarding your agricultural investment with the right insurance policy. - read more
Need a Quote?
Start your free farm insurance quote comparison here.
Knowledgebase
Insurance Underwriter: An insurance company, a financial institution that sells insurance.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.